Ducimus perferendis, tempore. Incidunt. Minim hendrerit provident condimentum diam? Itaque, sequi sunt repellat praesentium ipsum eros scelerisque iaculis! Recusandae recusandae etiam.
When a child support order is entered, many parents assume the purpose is straightforward: one parent pays, and that money supports the child. In practice, however, child support is frequently a source of confusion, frustration, and conflict.
Receiving parents sometimes feel the amount falls short of what their child truly needs. Paying parents sometimes wonder why they are being asked for more money when they already write a check every month.
Getting clarity on this issue can prevent unnecessary disputes and help both parents focus on what matters most: their child’s well-being.
Both Pennsylvania and New Jersey use the Income Shares Model. The concept is straightforward: children should receive the same proportion of parental income they would have had if the family had remained together.
Courts in both states combine both parents’ incomes and use that figure to determine a baseline child support obligation. Each parent then contributes proportionally based on their share of the combined income.
One small but practical difference worth noting: Pennsylvania calculates support using monthly net income, while New Jersey uses weekly net income. The framework is similar, but the mechanics differ.
The basic child support amount — the number on the order — is designed to cover the ordinary, everyday costs of raising a child. In both Pennsylvania and New Jersey, those costs include:
That final point surprises many parents. Routine medical copays and minor out-of-pocket health costs are not considered extras. They are already factored into the guideline amount.
This is where many parents run into confusion and conflict.
Base child support does not cover everything. Both Pennsylvania and New Jersey recognize a separate category of expenses that fall outside the standard calculation. These are sometimes called add-on or extraordinary expenses, and they require their own analysis.
Once a child’s unreimbursed medical costs exceed $250 per child per year, the excess is allocated to the parents in proportion to each parent’s share of the combined income. In Pennsylvania, this is governed by Pa.R.C.P. 1910.16-6(c). New Jersey follows a similar framework under its child support guidelines.
In Pennsylvania, there is also a strict documentation requirement: the parent seeking reimbursement must provide receipts and invoices by March 31 of the year following the expense. Missing that deadline gives the court discretion to deny the claim.
Work-related childcare expenses are treated as an add-on in both states. These costs are allocated proportionally between the parents, after accounting for applicable federal and state tax credits. They are not absorbed into the base support figure.
The cost of adding a child to a parent’s health insurance plan is handled separately in both states. In Pennsylvania, the law defines what constitutes a “reasonable cost” — generally no more than 5% of the paying parent’s monthly net income — and the parties share that cost proportionally.
Sports, music lessons, competitive travel teams, summer camps, and private school tuition are not automatically covered by child support. In both Pennsylvania and New Jersey, these costs may be allocated between the parents — but only if the court determines the expense is reasonable given the parties’ financial circumstances.
This is one of the most common sources of disagreement I see. One parent enrolls a child in an expensive activity and expects the other to split the cost. The other parent never agreed and feels blindsided. The answer usually comes down to the specific language of the support and custody orders and whether the court previously addressed such expenses.
Here, Pennsylvania and New Jersey take meaningfully different approaches.
In New Jersey, courts have the authority to order both parents to contribute to college tuition and related expenses. This is not automatic — the court weighs factors such as each parent’s financial resources, the child’s academic performance, and the availability of scholarships or financial aid. But the authority exists, and college contribution orders are common in New Jersey family courts.
In Pennsylvania, the situation is different. Following the Pennsylvania Supreme Court’s decision in Curtis v. Kline (1995), Pennsylvania courts cannot order a parent to contribute to a child’s college expenses. That authority was declared unconstitutional. Parents may voluntarily agree to share college costs through a settlement agreement, but no judge can compel them to do so. Child support in Pennsylvania generally ends when the child turns 18 or graduates from high school, whichever occurs later.
This distinction matters significantly for parents who are planning ahead.
Generally, no. Once child support is paid, the receiving parent is not required to account for how each dollar is spent. Child support is intended to help cover a child’s overall needs; housing, utilities, food, clothing, transportation, and other everyday expenses and not just items purchased directly for the child. As a result, courts generally do not monitor or dictate how the receiving parent allocates child support within the household budget. If a parent believes the support amount is no longer appropriate because of a significant change in circumstances, the proper remedy is to seek a modification of the support order, rather than attempting to control how the other parent spends the funds.
Read Your Order Carefully. Many support orders contain specific language about how unreimbursed medical expenses, childcare, and activities are to be handled. Do not assume the base support figure covers everything — or that it covers nothing beyond daily living costs. Review the actual language of your order before deciding who owes what.
Keep Records. Whether you are paying or receiving support, document significant child-related expenses. Save receipts, invoices, and any written communications about costs. In Pennsylvania especially, where documentation deadlines are strictly enforced, good recordkeeping can make the difference between recovering a cost and absorbing it entirely.
Communicate Before Spending. When a significant or unexpected expense arises — an emergency dental procedure, a new competitive sport, a private school application — discuss it with the other parent before assuming it will be shared. A brief conversation early on is far less costly than litigation later.
Child support disputes are among the most common family law matters. If you are unsure what your order covers, if the other parent is refusing to contribute to legitimate child-related costs, or if your child’s needs have changed substantially since the original order was entered, speaking with a family law attorney is a wise step.
Support orders in both Pennsylvania and New Jersey can be modified when circumstances change. Ambiguous order language can be clarified through negotiation or, if necessary, through the court.
Child support exists for one reason: to protect children. When both parents understand how it works in their state, they are far better positioned to meet that goal together.
If you have questions about child support laws in Philadelphia, Southeastern Pennsylvania, or South Jersey, please contact Scott Matison at scott@consolelegal.com.
With big firm experience and small firm personal service, Console Matison is dedicated to providing high-value legal services at affordable and competitive rates to individuals, families, small-business owners, developers, investors and entrepreneurs in Philadelphia and the surrounding Pennsylvania and New Jersey suburbs.
(267) 603 - 2493